You Responded, But Did You Answer the Question?

About Martha Brooke

Program Director and Founder, Interaction Metrics

Customer service boils down to a simple give and take: customers have questions or problems and companies provide answers. It’s pretty straightforward. But all too often, customers are left befuddled, scratching their heads and wondering: “What did they mean? Were they listening? What do I do now?”

Transparency and authenticity are the buzzwords of business. So why can’t customer service be more clear?

Let’s look at the word “answer”. Merriam Webster gives it two very different meanings:

  1. Something spoken or written in reply to a question. 
  2. A correct response.

Companies and their call centers often conflate the two meanings and assume that because they replied, they provided an answer.  But while all answers act as replies, not all replies provide an answer.  A real answer is accurate, complete, understandable and addresses the customer’s unique situation.  When customers ask for solutions, but get vague replies and obfuscations, brand loyalty and advocacy plummet. While yammering happens in stores, it is particularly prevalent in call centers.

There are a number of contributing factors:

First, follow the money: sadly, blather is profitable. Typically, revenues rise as call centers chat, talk and email more, regardless of the information conveyed and quality of the answer. And unstrategic call centers view web self-service as a revenue-eliminator, instead of seeing self service for what it is: a way to increase customer satisfaction.

Furthermore, good answers require an investment in resources and a level of spending that is beyond the scope of a typical call center.  Between putting out fires and filling seats (no easy task) call centers are stretched thin—at least relative to the budgets clients require.

Plus, sometimes companies are in a hurry to provide the bells and whistles of excellent customer service, the kind of service that personalizes, customizes and brands. While we always advocate doing more with customer service, this should never be at the expense of the basics. As Dixon, Freeman and Toman in the Harvard Business Review note, “what customers really want (but rarely get) is just a satisfactory solution to their service issue.” In other words, make sure your answers pass muster before aspiring to excellence.

How do you guarantee correct answers? For this, you may very well need an answer engine technology and you’ll also need what we call a Total Answer Management strategy. As Tom Wentworth and others have pointed out, technology is great but it won’t cure your customer experience by itself.  Here’s what a strategy of Total Answer Management means:

Total: Take inventory and prepare a report that details every question (including small variations) that customers have.  Make sure you study enough interactions—it should be at least one week’s worth of conversations.

Answer: Nail the responses to each and every customer question and thoroughly vet those answers for substance and style. Chefs show their cooks everything: how they want the egg poached, how the dish should be garnished and plated, etc. Likewise, if you can’t show your associates a perfect answer, don’t expect them to come up with it on their own. Without clear examples, customers will get different answers depending time of day and who they reach. That’s what Gallup found in their study of the quality of customer service in the Harvard Business Review: “the customer experience still depends almost entirely on the particular rep who takes the call.”

Management: Determine which questions are best answered by which customer service channel.  While some questions can be answered by an FAQ, others require the kind of interaction that only a phone call provides.  Management is about directing customers and measuring answer gaps. It’s also about continually monitoring to determine when answers need to be upgraded or added to—all while gauging how well call centers deliver on their promises.

How well do you answer customer questions?  We’d love to hear about your answer solutions and call center strategies.

Links and Resources:

 

Branding Customer Touchpoints: Why Most Companies Aren’t Cutting it

About Martha Brooke

Program Director and Founder, Interaction Metrics

With the dramatic success of startups like Dropbox, Groupon and Twitter, many people are wondering, what’s their secret? Forrester’s Kerry Bodine took note of one innovative approach shared by all three companies: these newer companies seek to actively brand and engage customer feelings at even minor customer touchpoints such as the confirmation email, bill, etc. This attention to managing brand detail could be driving heightened loyalty and advocacy levels.

Certainly, this idea of branding customer touchpoints has made its way into the zeitgeist with Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh describing the “telephone as one of best branding devices out there” and other marketers quick to point to the power of customer experience branding.

But the biggest companies mostly leave their customer touchpoints untapped for their brand value and when it comes to customer service (the most memorable of all touchpoints), branding is often completely ignored.

Bodine argues that these opportunities are squandered because large corporations are crippled by too many silos, over-concerned with the demands of ROI and lacking customer focus.

As Customer Experience Analysts, we find these factors are contributive, but hardly the root cause. The real reason why large corporations tend to lag when it comes to touchpoint branding is that corporations largely subscribe to an antiquated notion that engaging customers’ feelings belongs in the back room, not the board room.

Until CEOs and COOs start asking essential customer experience branding questions, like “what percent of our customer interactions are branded?” “how engaging are our frontline reps?” or “have we trained our customer service reps to deliver our core marketing messages?”, these large companies won’t have the institutional inertia to carry their big marketing ideas through to the front line.  And that means they won’t be able to keep up with the hip Zappos-types and Dropboxes of the world.