Blog Posts, Reports, Videos, and Observations

We share ideas along with client achievements to spur your
own thinking about how to improve your customer listening program.

Posts in the category of Interaction Metrics News


Retailers Waste Time with Critically Flawed Surveys

It seems that we’re asked to take a customer satisfaction survey with nearly every purchase. But do you ever wonder…do they really care what I have to say? Our 2016 Customer Listening Study, the first of its kind, evaluated the customer satisfaction surveys of 51 top US retailers. The main finding: retailers like Lowe’s and […]

Read More...

The Interaction Metrics Difference

Federico Muchnik of Mighty Visual Media just finished a dynamite video (below) that explains the difference between the usual simplistic ways of measuring customer experience and our nuanced approach. It’s not about MORE data, it’s about SMART data—and Federico drives that point home. First, watch Fed’s video. Then, contact us to discuss whether a serious, research-backed […]

Read More...

NYC August 20: The Future of Customer Service.

Martha is speaking during the closing keynote panel of Customer Service Experience (part of Customer Solutions Expo) at the Marriott Marquis in New York on Wednesday August 20, 11:45 AM. Along with Esteban Kolsky of ThinkJar, R. Wang of Constellation Research, Kate Leggett of Forester Research, she’ll be discussing the future of customer service. From […]

Read More...

Bob Thompson’s Hooked on Customers: Companies Listen Up!

The team at Interaction Metrics loved Bob Thompson’s Hooked on Customers. We thought the overall premise—that companies need more than “strategies,” they need the right habits—is correct. As customer experience auditors, we come across lots of companies who pride themselves on satisfaction, but what counts is execution, day in and day out. Bob drives this […]

Read More...

Current State of Customer Service: 55%

55%: As of March 31, 2014, we’ve calculated the current Quality of Customer Interaction (QCI™) Benchmark Score. We’ve been tracking this cumulative measure of customer service since 2011, and this quarter hasn’t seen much improvement (Q4/2013 was 54%). Our QCI™ Benchmark is based on 137 unique companies who, at the time of scoring had NOT […]

Read More...

Current State of Customer Service: 54%

Since 2011, Interaction Metrics has tracked the quality of customer service and published the cumulative Quality of Customer Interaction (QCI™) Benchmark Score. As of Dec. 31, 2013, the score is 54 out of 100. Read about our methodology below. As we’ve pointed out in prior posts, other indices suggest that customer service needs improvement. For […]

Read More...

Customer Service Still Gets a Failing Grade

Since 2011, Interaction Metrics has been benchmarking the national quality of customer service. We call this our Quality of Customer Interaction (QCI™) Score. As of September, 2013, the score is 54 out of 100; in other words, customer service gets a failing grade. Read about our methodology here. As we’ve mentioned before, other indices point […]

Read More...

NYC | Customer Service Experience Conference

Tomorrow (Aug. 20th) I’ll be speaking at the Customer Service Experience Conference in NYC. Keith Dawson from Ovum and I will be discussing how to get high-insight, accurate feedback from customers. We’ll talk about customer satisfaction surveys, customer interviews, and a few other techniques. Attend and start improving the customer experience now! In the meantime, learn […]

Read More...

Customer Service Gets a Failing Grade

Since 2011, Interaction Metrics has been benchmarking the national quality of customer service. We call this our Quality of Customer Interaction (QCI™) Score. As of June 21, 2013, the score is 52 out of 100; in other words, customer service gets a failing grade. Read about our methodology here. Other indices point to a similarly […]

Read More...

Let's Discuss Customer Listening:

Don't forget your name
Don't forget your company
Required format: bob@example.com
Click here if you're not a robot.

Don't forget to check the box above. It helps us prevent spam.